Sunday, April 30, 2023

guilty until proven innocent: The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum (1975)

    Die verlorene Ehre der Katharina Blum [DVD] = The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum; Volker Schlöndorff, screenwriter, director; Margarethe von Trotta, co-director. Criterion collection, 177 [2003]. Originally produced as a motion picture in 1975. Based on: Die Verlorene Ehre der Katharina Blum, by Heinrich Böll. Performers: Willi Benninger, Angela Winkler, Mario Adorf, Heinz Bennent, Jürgen Prochnow, Karl Heinz Vosgerau.
   Summary: In the period of several days, Katharina's privacy and her honor are destroyed, first by the police who terrorize her, and then by the yellow press, which creates in her name the image of a politicized Mata Hari. Bonus features: interview with directors Volker Schlöndorff and Margarethe von Trotta; interview with Jost Vacano (cinematographer); excerpts from Ivo Barnabó Micheli's 1977 biographical film on Heinrich Böll (in German with English subtitles).


   Margarethe von Trotta’s and Volker Schlondorff’s 1975 classic is a cautionary tale of the human costs of sensationalist, irresponsible journalism working in concert with a fascist-minded, law-and-order state: a timid woman (her friends call her ‘the nun’) spends a romantic night with a man the authorities suspect of being a terrorist. As a result her private life is mercilessly infringed upon by both the police and the yellow press. Dating from the edgy 1970s in Germany, Katharina Blum’s half century vintage hasn’t dulled its message for our own, eerily similar, current climate. If anything the film is even more relevant today. In an interesting and ironic aside, in today’s world, concerns about domestic terrorists, at least in the U.S., focus on the radicalized right. A half century or so ago it was the extreme left that caused all the huffing and puffing, both in America and Europe.

    In any case the New German Cinema’s socially conscious gestalt is presented front and center in Katharina Blum, in which an otherwise blandly ordinary woman is made the target of vilification by a tabloid press. Among the tricks of the trade said press employs: distorting the woman’s own statements, publishing photographs that make her look guilty, and digging up supposed dirt on her through interviews (subsequently highly embroidered in print) with those close to her, including relatives, employers and an ex-husband [1].

    “is the state unable to protect you against this garbage?”

    Katherina Blum has been called ahead of its time in the trends it anticipated a half century prior. True, up to a point. But it certainly didn’t get there first: self-serving, sensation mongering media have been around, well, for a long time, perhaps most blisteringly depicted cinematically in Billy Wilder’s Ace in the Hole, in which an ambitious, ethically challenged (to put it generously) journalist, and not the victim, is the main character [2]. But the film that reminds me most of KB, because of the similar subject matter and era, dates from three decades and change later, and that’s The Baader Meinhof Complex, a brilliant film to be sure but somehow lacking the sharp edge of KB. This is perhaps because Katharina Blum is historically authentic – it actually dates from the era – while Baader Meinhof is retro, almost a nostalgic period piece, if you like. Moreover, 
Katharina Blum has a certain rough around the edges quality that contributes to its intensity and unease, as opposed to Baader Meinhof’s more polished product [3].  
  
Whatever its many aesthetic merits and few shortcomings, The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum is just plain painful to watch (while the thuggish police browbeat Katharina relentlessly, I kept wondering: where’s the damned lawyer!). However, the story has its humor, if that is the word, perhaps most pointedly driven home with Kafka-like absurdity in the scene in which a bizarrely costumed police force conduct a grotesquely excessive SWAT-team like raid on the poor girl’s apartment, culminating in an insultingly invasive interrogation, which includes a strip search, by the way all done with nary a search warrant in sight. Indeed the police antics, brutal and heavy-handed as they are, sometimes seem more Gilbert & Sullivan than Gestapo or Stasi.

    Indeed, most of the violence done to Katharina is not physical but rather psychological and emotional, and arguably not done by the police as much as the tabloid press. In an ironic twist it is Katharina who commits more physical violence than her tormenters ever inflict upon her. Somehow I couldn’t help thinking of the case of actress Jean Seberg. Hounded by her own government, along with an acquiescent press that helped spread innuendo, gossip and outright lies, Seberg, like Katharina, had few friends among the powerful she could call on. Alas, she eventually resorted to suicide. Mirroring Seberg, Katharina resorts to a kind of metaphorical suicide. 
 
    To tell their story Von Trotta and Schlondorff have opted for natural settings – drab workplaces, nondescript domestic interiors, unromanticized outdoor scenes. It all contributes to the you-are-there, slice of life feel reminiscent of the American independent films of the era. At the same time cameraman Jost Vacano favors harsh, flat lighting and spartan geometric forms that suggest an authoritarian vibe more akin to East Germany than West.

   Indeed, in the difficult-to-take, Orwellian epilogue, we could be forgiven for suspecting that the vulgar, self-congratulatory pean rendered by – and for – the socio-economic power elite is a scene stage managed in the evil GDR and not the virtuous, democratic-minded Federal Republic. Corporate controlled media, then and now, relies on the sanctity of 'freedom of the press,' however extreme its manifestations, to justify its dependence on a mass audience to sustain its large profits. (Although the analogy may not be perfect, the similarity to the sanctimonious cries of ‘free speech’ of more recent times can hardly be missed). 

    Still, the filmmakers are to be praised for injecting a certain ambiguity into a story operating from such a moral and emotional stacked deck. The extent of Katharina’s initial culpability is left unanswered, as is the criminal guilt of Ludwig, or for that matter, how he managed to escape from her apartment building. Likewise, their eventual fates are left open-ended.

    Ultimately 
Katharina Blum is a sober reminder that, even in ostensibly free societies, a citizen’s rights are not absolute or inalienable: rights that can arbitrarily be taken away by the state or infringed upon by an all-seeing media aren’t rights at all, but only temporary privileges.


   [1] In the film’s sleaziest scene, the tabloid paper’s star reporter sneaks into a hospital’s intensive care unit and tries to extract information from Katharina’s seriously ill mother. She tells him nothing but he later spuriously quotes her in print. She dies soon after. The shock of the reporter’s visit may well have tipped her over.
   [2]  There’s also La Dolce Vita, in which an ethically indifferent journalist and his cadre of photographers dig up scandal on Rome’s beautiful people. LDV shares with KB a certain postmodern cynicism amidst the backdrop of media corruption, but the context is different: the earlier work concerns itself with the culture of celebrity, the jaded rich, and Old World decadence, while Katharina Blum has much more of a political edge. Contemporary, quintessentially paranoic, even existential in its uncompromising, take-no-prisoners attitude, Katharina Blum is actually closer in tone and spirit to Ace in the Hole than Dolce Vita.  
   [3] When the DVD of KB came out two decades or so ago most of the comparisons were, understandably if rather facilely, to the 9/11 attacks and the resultant paranoia in the U.S. Heavy handed government intrusions on individual liberties were buttressed by a compliant media and its uncritical acceptance of the war-on-terror meme, the ultimate result being that all news outlets, the vast majority anyway, were little more than cheerleaders of official policy. Two decades later a similar paranoia set in with the Covid 19 virus and the resultant, some might say inevitable, politicization of the situation, especially in the highly polarized U.S., where recriminations and counter-recriminations flew fast and furious, and to some extent still do.

Monday, April 17, 2023

thoughts on 'greatest movies,' and a top ten

    As a matter of principle I’m against these lists, for many reasons, first among them being: it’s impossible to choose the greatest movies of all time, much less the single 'greatest movie' of all time. How do we define ‘great,’ and do we all agree on the definition? More on this below. Moreover, where does ‘greatest’ end and ‘favorites’ begin? And as much as I look askance at the BFI/S&S poll, I like their definition of greatness in a movie and indeed will apply their yardstick to my own very subjective choices. Their voters are asked to interpret ‘greatest’ as they chose: to reflect the film’s importance in cinematic history, its aesthetic achievement, or perhaps its personal impact in their own life and their view of cinema.

    Anyhow since BFI and Sight & Sound will never ask my opinion, and considering I’ve already made a precedent with posts on somewhat related topics (little known movies, greatest cinematic geniuses, and best art movies), here are my thoughts and my ‘Top 10’.

    The biggest frustration is choosing only ten titles. And yes, it pains me to leave out certain films, directors, too: you won’t find anything by Kurosawa, Godard, Fassbinder, Antonioni, or Bergman. So be it. A list of 10 is a list of 10 (even if I fudge the matter and have two ties, so this is, strictly speaking, a list of twelve). I demur from including an honorable mention section. On the other hand, some big names do make the cut, ergo there’s one title each by Hitchcock and Welles, though the choice of Touch of Evil instead of Kane or Ambersons may raise eyebrows [1]. But the truth is, at this level, individual films are pretty much interchangeable: to wit, why Kiss Me Deadly and not Out of the Past; why Carnival of Souls and not The Seventh Victim or Night of the Living Dead; why Dementia and not Meshes of the Afternoon? In any event, here goes, more or less in chronological order:

 

Trouble in Paradise

tie: Kiss Me Deadly

     Sunset Boulevard

Dementia /Daughter of Horror

Touch of Evil

Vertigo

Deux Hommes dans Manhattan

La Dolce Vita

Last Year at Marienbad

Carnival of Souls

tie: Beyond the Valley of the Dolls

     A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night

 

     Comments: it’s pretty obvious that I favor black and white films released in, or around, the 1950s, also that I tend to go with B movies, quirky oddities, and genre films over big-budget Hollywood blockbusters. Guilty on all counts. Of course I could just as easily replace these ten with another ten, and another, and they would be just as representative of ‘greatness’, as well as honest choices in representing my opinion. Echoing what I’ve written above, at this level – the top 100 or so, give or take a few dozen – the ‘greatest’ movies are more or less interchangeable. Not to belabor the point, but for example, I could choose all color movies and all-Euro directors and be just as valid in my combination of the subjective with the canonically great. The films might be the likes of The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant, Death in Venice, Juliet of the Spirits, Lola Montes, The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum, Portrait of a Lady on Fire, Cries and Whispers, The Red Shoes, and, well, you get the idea.

 

[1] Perhaps my selecting Touch of Evil is my modest protest that the film was bumped from BFI’s Top 250 this time around, though Kane and Ambersons still made the grade, placing 3 and tied 169 respectively. Speaking of Orson Welles, it occurs to me that for the greatest movies of all time I could choose ten Orson Welles movies and not be that far off the mark. Oh well, plus ça change ...

Saturday, April 1, 2023

"this is my happening ..." : Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (1970)

 
    Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (Motion picture); a Russ Meyer production; screenplay by Roger Ebert; story by Roger Ebert and Russ Meyer; produced and directed by Russ Meyer; music, Stu Phillips; director of photography, Fred J. Koenekamp; art directors, Jack Martin Smith, Arthur Lonergan; editors, Dann Cahn, Dick Wormell. Produced and released by Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation. Two-DVD special edition; widescreen. New York, N.Y.: The Criterion Collection, 2016. Originally released as a motion picture in 1970.
    "The film ... is not a sequel to Valley of the Dolls. It does ... deal with the oft-times nightmare world of show business in a different time and place."  
    Performers: Dolly Read, Cynthia Myers, Marcia McBroom, John LaZar, Michael Blodgett, David Gurian, Edy Williams, Erica Gavin, Phyllis Davis, Henry Rowland, Harrison Page, Duncan McLeod, Jim Iglehart, Haji, Charles Napier, and the Strawberry Alarm Clock.
    Summary: "In 1970, Twentieth Century-Fox, impressed by the visual zing that 'King of the Nudies' Russ Meyer had been bringing to bargain-basement exploitation fare, handed the director a studio budget and the title to one of its biggest hits, Valley of the Dolls. With a satirical screenplay by Roger Ebert, Beyond the Valley of the Dolls follows three young female rockers going Hollywood, in hell-bent Sixties style, under the spell of a flamboyant producer, whose decadent bashes showcase Meyer's trademark libidinal exuberance. Transgressive and outrageous, this big-studio version of a debaucherous midnight movie is an addictively entertaining romp from one of the movies' great outsider artists" - Container.


 
    My first Russ Meyer movie: I remember it well. No, it wasn’t Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, but no worries, we’ll get to it. Anyhow, being a fresh-faced first semester freshman at our small-town university back in the day, some friends and I thought it would be fun – and definitely naughty – to go see such forbidden fruit as a nudie movie. The film was Finders Keepers, Lovers Weepers [1], apparently not one of Meyer’s more memorable efforts but immensely entertaining, at least I thought so. The film played in a mainstream theater on the main street in town, as did the next film in the Meyer pantheon, the much more famous, and better, Vixen, starring Erica Gavin. Of course I also made it a point to check out Vixen. Aside: at about this time I also took in Gone with the Wind, maybe at the same theater (I hope so; the irony appeals to me). I’d never seen GWTW before and it was currently in the midst of revival screenings. Impressive it was, certainly for its era, but the Meyer flicks made more of an impression. Today, at the risk of being heretical, I’d say Beyond the Valley of the Dolls is straight up a better movie than Gone with the Wind. But I begin to digress. In any event, when I first heard that the title of Meyer’s then-newest, ultimate opus was going to be Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, I thought, you gotta’ be kidding me. Curiously, the specifics of my catching Dolls are much less precise in the memory (the release date was July 1970). The venue may have been a drive-in, maybe a theater. The explanation must be that so much had happened in the world and in my own life in the intervening couple of years that it just didn’t register as much. Even the content of the movie didn’t stand out in the memory, and thus I can only recall a few details from that initial viewing: Ronnie Z-Man’s big reveal, the beheading, Edy Williams, that’s about all. I’d even forgotten that it was (sort of) a musical.

     Now, a half century later, I just caught Dolls again, and call it nostalgia, sentiment, whatever, I absolutely loved it, so much so that I saw the film two times, four actually if you count the two commentary tracks. What they say about the film is true: it ages like fine wine. In a word, time has been kind to Beyond the Valley of the Dolls. Perhaps the explanation is its very obviousness and lack of guile. For all the nudity, colorful language, sexual situations, and occasional shocking violence, Dolls has an innocence, warmth and optimism, which, along with its high gloss look, is still appealing and endearing, thus allowing the film to transcend its, frequently sordid, subject matter.
Meyer is to be further commended because he, like my own parents, was of the prior, WW2 generation that, to say the least, simply didn’t relate to the Summer of Love, anti-war protests, the drug scene, rock music, and everything else going on in the 1960s, and were more often than not mystified, even revolted, by it. Thus it's to Meyer’s credit, albeit with script writer Ebert’s vital contribution, that he got it right on so many of the cultural references of ca. 1969 [2], even granting it’s all done in the context of satire.

       As for Dolls itself, the principals give it their all, and they actually add, shall we say, authenticity to the mix in that most aren’t professional actors, but nonetheless quite good in their roles. Their exuberance, and a lot of the innocence, carries over onto the DVD commentary by five of the actors (Dolly Read, Cynthia Myers, Harrison Page, John LaZar, and Erica Gavin), who are having a great time reminiscing and adding their own little touches of history and trivia. By the way Roger Ebert’s more cerebral commentary track is equally engaging, providing much film industry detail and lots on director Meyer.

    Beyond the Valley of the Dolls will always, I suppose, polarize fans (and non-fans), a movie that people either love or hate, consider it a kind of masterpiece or a candidate for the worst movies of all time hall of fame. Well, for better or worse, I fall into the love category. I don’t know if I’d anoint it a masterpiece, though it may be Meyer’s masterpiece. But whatever one might think of the film’s desultory, Felliniesque content, from a purely technical point of view it’s absolutely first rate, and it just plain looks great (sounds great, too) in Criterion’s all-the-trimmings 2-DVD release [3]. The film then is sui generis; nothing quite like it has ever been put on the screen, before or since, and it’s been creeping up in critical esteem over the years [4].
   More important, the film is an eloquent valedictory coda to all that was right, and wrong, with the Sixties, as well as a meditation on the energetic recklessness of youth and the joy of living in that wild, wonderful, sometimes irresponsible time, gone forever it would seem. But not so fast, my friend: Dolls may be a half century and counting vintage but, in its wacky way, still modern, more than a little wise, and, perhaps most important, it says something to us about, life, love and the human condition that’s both timely and timeless.

style
****
substance
****


    [1] There’s one scene in Finders Keepers in which a guy is having a steamy phone conversation with the object of his desire as Chopin wafts in the background. Pretty heady stuff – a touch of class in a skin flick.

    [2] As one who lived during the counter-culture era of the late Sixties, in my opinion Dolls is not that exaggerated in the various tableaux and the use of hippy/youth slang. The film actually captures the zeitgeist pretty well, however flawed, or excessive, some of the details. But more important, it got the spirit right.

   [3] The Criterion version includes a bevy of special features, including the above-mentioned commentary tracks; the making-of short, "Above, Beneath and Beyond the Valley: The Making of a Musical-Horror-Sex-Comedy;" episode from 1988 of The 'Incredibly Strange Film Show' on director Russ Meyer, and others. But my favorites are the extended interview with John Waters in which he talks about his association with Meyer and offers a brief overview of Meyer's career; and the very sweet "Casey & Roxanne: The Love Scene", in which Cynthia Myers and Erica Gavin look back three and a half decades later at their lesbian scenes in the film.
     Aside: I always preferred that actors sing their own songs, and I labored under the illusion that the women in the rock group actually sang their own material. Alas, I later found out to the contrary, though the lip synching is pretty darn good. In any case apparently the women just didn’t have the voices to convincingly put over the tunes.

      [4] One measure of Dolls’ growing critical acceptance is that it received two votes in the 2012 BFI/Sight & Sound poll of the greatest movies of all time.
* While two votes might qualify as a low-level honorable mention at best, it’s better than no acknowledgement at all. The film is also beginning to show up on directors’ and cineaste’s best films lists.
    Aside: it's curious that the fiftieth anniversary of Dolls in 2020 went largely unheralded. Searches online and elsewhere yielded a paucity of results as to think pieces or public events. Part of the explanation of the lack of Golden Anniversary gala events may have been due to bad timing: this was the first year of the Covid virus.  

   * Sight & Sound/BFI has a relatively simple and, at least in theory, equitable method of ranking the films. For the 2022 poll, each critic of the 1,639 total critics polled was asked to submit his/her own top ten choices. Each film that gets a vote gets a point, the points are tallied at the end and the films ranked by the number of points.
     By the way in case one wonders why I reference 2012 in fn4 above and not 2022, the explanation is that, as of the writing of this post, I’ve been unable to locate a comprehensive list of films that received at least one vote in the 2022 poll.
     [Update, 13 May 2024: While it took some digging, I was able to verify that in the 2022 poll Dolls received four votes, again a low level honorable mention of the four thousand-odd titles that received at least one vote. It should be mentioned that the information I found combined both the critics' and directors' polls, thus if we fudge the numbers four votes might be considered roughly analogous to the two votes it received last time around (2012). Also of interest is that two other Meyer productions, Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! (4 votes) and Beneath the Valley of the Ultra Vixens (1 vote) were listed, all of which is signaling a measure of respectability for Meyer as a director of substance.]